Three Headlines, One Conclusion
The first week of November delivered three lithium battery headlines almost simultaneously — all of them about energy storage.
-
November 3: LG Energy Solution signed a KRW 1.035 trillion (about USD 778 million) long-term LFP cathode supply agreement with Korean materials maker L&F, aimed at ESS and AI data center applications, with both sides explicitly strengthening a non-China supply chain.
-
Same day: Samsung SDI began mass production of prismatic LFP ESS cells in Indiana and confirmed 60 GWh of US storage orders, positioning the site as its ESS battery hub.
-
Same day: CATL won the battery equipment contract for a 300 MW / 1.2 GWh standalone storage project in Inner Mongolia.
Read together, the message is consistent: demand has not gone away, but competition has shifted from “who has the most capacity” to “who can deliver LFP reliably.” Overseas players are building localized capacity while Chinese leaders lock in utility-scale orders — squeezing lead times and pricing power for everyone in between.
Demand: Storage Is Growing Nearly Three Times Faster Than EV
According to the China Automotive Battery Innovation Alliance, in the first nine months of 2026 China sold 1,086.4 GWh of EV batteries, up 38.2% year on year, and 595.4 GWh of storage batteries, up 111.8%. Storage is now growing at roughly three times the pace of EV batteries, and the industry has moved from an EV-only engine to a dual engine.
Company data points in the same direction. CATL sold more than 260 GWh of EV and storage batteries combined in Q3, with storage accounting for about a quarter; it describes overseas storage demand as strong. EVE Energy signed a 206 GWh supply agreement with Fluence for 2027–2031, with 16 GWh already scheduled for 2027. Envision goes further: within three years, global storage cell shipments could match or exceed EV batteries.
Prices and Lead Times: High-End LFP Is Tight, November Output Turns Negative
Demand certainty is rising while supply tightens at the high end. Hunan Yuneng sold 1.1157 million tonnes of phosphate cathode material in the first three quarters, up 42.14% year on year; high-end products reached 70% of Q3 volume and are described as sold out, with LFP demand expected to grow around 30% next year. Defang Nano likewise reports limited capacity able to supply fourth-generation high-compaction material at consistent quality.
Prices already reflect this. 314Ah LFP ESS cells moved from RMB 0.26–0.31/Wh at the end of 2025 to RMB 0.36–0.39/Wh in the first half of 2026, with leading suppliers above RMB 0.40/Wh; 587Ah cells are priced higher still.
On the supply side, China’s total November cell output plan is about 323 GWh, down roughly 5% month on month — the first negative month of the year. One driver is policy timing: under the Ministry of Finance and STA Announcement No. 2 of 2026, the VAT export rebate on battery products is cancelled from January 1, 2027, so the Q4 pull-forward window is narrowing. This is not a demand collapse: order visibility at leading utility-scale storage suppliers already extends into Q1 2027.
Solid-State: The Direction Is Clear, Waiting Is Not
In September, seven Chinese ministries issued the 15th Five-Year Plan for the New Battery Industry, targeting initial large-scale deployment of all-solid-state batteries by 2030; CATL says small-batch production is possible in 2027. Industrially, however, early solid-state cells cost roughly 3–10 times liquid lithium batteries, and global effective capacity of lithium sulfide — a key material — is only about 830 tonnes, enough for roughly 3 GWh of cells. Commercialization remains very early.
For AGV fleets, home energy storage, backup power and light mobility projects, LFP and lead-acid remain the working technologies for the next three to five years. There is no reason to delay a project waiting for solid-state.
Four Practical Tips for Buyers
-
Lock specifications, not just price. Confirm real available capacity and lead time for mainstream large cells such as 314Ah and 587Ah. One month of delivery difference can outweigh a few cents per Wh.
-
Rework your 2027 export math now. With the export rebate cancelled, quotations, customs timing and long-term contract clauses all need revision; build price-adjustment and policy-change clauses into frame agreements.
-
Write BMS and thermal management into acceptance criteria. As cells get larger, thermal runaway control is the safety baseline — and the first place weaker suppliers cut corners.
-
Evaluate total cost of ownership. Cycle life, warranty years and replacement costs usually matter more than a few cents saved per Wh.
EABK supplies lead-acid and LiFePO4 batteries, including AGV batteries, home energy storage systems and matching chargers, with datasheets, samples and delivery plans available per project. Contact us for selection advice for your market.


English
French
German
Italian
Spanish
Portuguese
Dutch
中文